It always surprises us how
many prospective clients say they want only people with positive attitudes on
their team.
When faced with this we have
to ask,
1.
What do you mean
only?
2.
And what do you
mean by positive attitude?
Typically we hear the
following answers in so many words-
1.
We want people
who follow instructions and do their job.
2.
We want people
who are resilient and can handle change and adversity.
3.
We want people who
look for solutions not problems.
4.
We want people
who can persevere.
5.
We don’t like
people who talk back.
6.
We just don’t
want any negative people in our company.
7.
When I say jump,
I want people who say “how high!”
8.
I want “yes I can” people.
And we hear many other
derivations of the above.
Here is the challenge-Many
positions actually require critical people who are highly analytical with an
eagle eye for detail and error. These aren’t people with a negative attitude. Lets
consider the following positions-
1.
QA Tech
2.
Compliance
Supervisor
3.
Quality Control
Manager
4.
Electrical
Inspector
5.
Industrial
Engineer
6.
Safety Manager
7.
Under ground wire
and pipe locator
8.
Auditor
And many other positions, do
not need, or should we say, cannot have a delusional sycophant (another word
for “always has a positive attitude”) in place, if your the goal is a high
performer. Many hiring managers and business owners who adhere to the positive
attitude test, if left to their own instinct, would hire people who are prone
to sycophant behavioral tendencies.
This is the main point. When
hiring, organizations need to know the behavioral tendencies required to
perform well and those that may derail a candidate. This is much more nuanced
than a simple gut feel if someone is negative or positive.
Jim Collins, in his Book, Good
to Great, makes it clear that the best CEO’s advocate and promote debate
and desire people who will stand up for how they see impact and potential
outcomes from major decisions.
That being said, hiring
managers and business owners need to know not only a candidate’s behavioral
tendencies, but those behaviors that can lead to success or failure for each
position. We call this benchmarking or
profiling a position.
Lets look at a few of the
more detailed behaviors we suggest benchmarking and then assessing candidates
for the tendency, using normed evidence based tools.
Excitable, Skeptical, Cautious, Reserved,
Leisurely
Bold, Mischievous, Colorful, Imaginative,
Diligent, Dutiful
As you can see, each one of the tendencies
may or may not be perceived as positive or negative. Each one also has sub behaviors.
And there a number of other behaviors and cognitive
skills that are predictive of job fit and on the job performance. Every job and
culture will have a different benchmark and profile that helps guide a decision
about potential success or failure of a candidate.
As you might see now, assessing candidates,
is not as easy as asking, “do they have a positive attitude”. A positive attitude may not even be needed and
in fact depending on the job, may be an impediment to post hire job performance.
We believe, and research validates our
belief, this cannot be left to gut or instinct feel of a hiring manger or
business owner.
By-Kenneth l. Greenberg, CEO-KLG Consultants, LLC
KLG Consultants, LLC a Talent Acquisition and Talent Development firm based in Colorado. The firm offers custom professional development
programs and skilled professionals on an outsourced and permanent hire
basis to organizations of all types and size.
A Few other behaviors to consider when making hiring decisions.
ReplyDeleteAdjustment
open to feedback
candid and honest
moody and self-critical
calm
steady under pressure
resistant to feedback
Ambition
good team players
willing to let others lead
complacent
energetic
competitive
restless and forceful
Sociability
good at working alone
quiet
socially reactive
outgoing
talkative
attention-seeking
Interpersonal Sensitivity
direct and frank
willing to confront others
cold and tough
friendly
warm
conflict averse
Prudence
flexible
open-minded
impulsive
organized
dependable
inflexible
Inquisitive
practical
not easily bored
uninventive
imaginative
quick-witted
poor implementers
Learning Approach